Does anybody has answers...??? Part-2

This is about charged particles. Another name for charges is 'subatomic particles'. Like my earlier post, related to gravity, charges also do have a mystery. I might not be able to crack this mystery in my study.So, I would appreciate any type of explanations and theories.


Current and modern-science theory tells us the three main types of subatomic particles i.e. proton(positive), electron(negative) and neutron(neutral). But, what makes them to be so??? 

--> And 'charge is the property or energy of the particular particle', its not the name of the particle.

--> How can we judge and predict a particle to be positive or negative or neutral, without being told or already known?

Suppose, take a random situation where a particle is stable or kept. The energy is emanating out of it(as being said by the modern science theory), and this energy is known as the 'charge'. Then, how can the property of the particle can be judged, that, this particle is +ve or -ve or neutral in nature?? Energy is energy, how can we predict then the nature of energy of the particle....Unless we are already knowing that the particular atom has this and this, so and so number  of -vely and +vely charged particles.


--> Secondly, the same question also arises here as in gravitational force, How a particle emanates a never-ending energy without any known power-source???
A charge emanates the energy without diminishing by even 0.1% of its strength and that too without any known power-source. Is this possible??
            So, here charged particle also somewhere violates the 'Law of Conservation of Energy'.

--> And here is something i think is the biggest blunder theory related to charged particles.As charged paricles are also known as subatomic-particles, so, in an atom lies a nucleus, which is said to be +vely charged because the certain no. of protons revolving inside it(the no. of protons depends on the valency of the element). How can the all positively charged particles reside inside the nucleus overcoming the force of repulsion...??? The nucleus should explode in this case.
           The explanation given on this overcoming of repulsion force is the strong-nuclear force applied on the protons.Now, from Where and How does this strong-nuclear arises?? The source of this force is again unkown. Modern science theory doesn't have any clear and exact explanation of this, all it have is only the strong-nuclear force with no known originating point...(if we don't move to the mathematics to prove this, i know maths can prove anything.). This is like ...'a book is on the table because it is kept there.' [among our engg. friends we call it PJ ;-)]   This what I think is taping and patch-work to somehow prove the study and the research.


-->Modern-science theory claims the strong-nuclear force as the strongest known force in the nature.


May some other and new kind of theory has the answers and explanation of these questions.But, modern-science theory is what we are taught in our educational institutes, and I'm no different than just a student of an average educational institute.I'm in search of the new theories for the explanations. So, if anyone has any explanation related to this then...I would humbly appreciate the explanations.

Does anybody has answers...???

This is about Newton, considered as the greatest scientiest till the times. I was studying gravity and its forces applied in our daily life...i found a few loop-holes in the Newton's Gravitational theory....a few unexplained questions (why?) about the gravity. I'm mentioning here a few what i thought something unusual and lacking in scientific grounds during my study of 'Gravity and its forces'. I'm not trying to question Newton's theory and prove the theory wrong and fake....but its just...what i felt...something lacking or loop-hole....I might not be certain, so..  I would welcome any type of suggestions and explanations related to it...

                                                                                                               

-- > Newton's theory doesn't explain why objects attract each other...means,....Why the gravity is always an attractive force unlike other major forces in nature which are both attractive and repulsive....What i thought about this is ....it just can be a hypothesis of Newton(im not detailing here, how?)

-- >There is no known power source of the gravitational force...which claims to be emanating from earth(planet or just a object with mass). It seems just like a huge mass is emanating energy out of it without any power source....What's providing earth such unending and unlimited power ??? This power seems to b never ending from the numerous centuries and still not diminishing by even 0.1% of its strength. How this is possible ??

-- > This so strong and never-ending energy emanating actually violates our Law of Conservation of Energy, the most basic yet fundamental of modern science.
           This violation of law is generally explained by the improper use of the equation 'work-function' (im not detailing here what is work function and how it works).


There might be more violations or might be no violations....so, all the explanations are welcome....